What do they know?

I wrote recently about the mess that I felt our department’s assessment system was in. Since the introduction of the new specification at GCSE, and the removal of National Curriculum levels at KS3, I feel we have lost sight of what we are assessing for. I may be speaking too soon, but I think I may have finally cracked it.

Our department’s guiding principle is that we should “expect excellence”. We have a clear idea of what we think an excellent geographer should be able to do and have organised these ideas under 9 different strands. We want to ensure that any assessment encourages high aspirations for all and doesn’t put a lid on this aspiration.

9 Strands of an Excellent Geographer

I started by asking “what do we need an assessment to do?” and came up with:

  1. To find out what pupils know, understand and can do.
  2. To be able to clearly identify gaps in pupil’s learning and give feedback on how to close them.
  3. Report on whether pupils are on track towards their target (in line with the school policy).

So we are starting with learning and putting this learning first. For each topic, I am proposing that we will have a learning checklist of what we expect an excellent student to know and be able to do by the end of the Key Stage. They will be very specific to the topic covered. They are also binary. They either do or do not know it, can or can’t do it. I want to avoid the problem with relying on assessment of “extent”. Categorising into tiers should allow for this differentiation.

These key learning outcomes can be categorised by difficulty into low, middle and higher. I would expect that someone who have leant everything up to and including the higher tier will eventually achieve a grade 7-9, middle tier 4-6 and the lower tier 1-3. This is, of course, a very rough outline but is based on years of teaching this subject and seeing what pupils need to be know or be able to do to achieve different grades.

The learning checklist for a Year 7 unit on Water Landscapes would look like this.

I hope that any Geography teachers reading that would agree that a Year 7 student who had learnt this would be on the path to becoming an excellent Geographer.

Once we have the learning checklist we can think about how we assess whether pupils have learnt what we want them to. I am planning on using exam papers which mimic the style of the GCSE papers and which test a large sample of the checklist at each tier. When marking the paper, teachers will use the checklist to show what pupils have been able to do but will also collect the raw score from the paper.

The raw score won’t be used to provide a grade but will allow comparisons between students. This will give us another indication as to whether they are in track towards their target grade. If a pupil who is targeting a 6 achieves 45% on the test and those targeting 4s achieve 45% as well, I’d suggest this indicates that they are not on track. We can rank pupils based on their test score and compare this to either their ranking in previous tests or on their KS2 data. This will give us another indication of progress.

To be honest, the ability to report on progress towards, what is nationally, a currently ill defined GCSE grade is always going to be fraught with difficulties. We know what percentage will achieve certain key grades but the standard needed for that grade remains an unknown and will depend on how the rest of the cohort perform. What excites me more is that the learning checklist and the test allows us to quickly assess what pupils know. It puts learning back at the heart of our assessment.


10 thoughts on “What do they know?

  1. Pingback: Educational Reader’s Digest | Friday 26th May – Friday 2nd June – Douglas Wise

  2. Enjoyed reading this. I think the problem with checklists is that they are capable of being interpreted in so many different ways. So pinning them down in the guise of exact questions as you are doing is helpful. My dream is to create banks and banks of formative questions that sit underneath each item on a checklist – these would a) define the item b) allow pupils to test themselves over time c) allow teachers to adjust their teaching in response to the answers. Still a long way away from that though!


  3. Pingback: Assessment in geography  | Driffield School and Sixth Form Teaching and Learning Blog

  4. using checklists like some of the examples provided is a great way to pre-assess what students know. I use zzi.sh to help students self test and review material through out the year.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Pingback: The Best of 2017 | Class Teaching

  6. Pingback: Assessment in geography | Driffield School and Sixth Form Teaching and Learning Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s